Main

July 15, 2008

Terry Theise Vintage 2007 Germany and Austria Tasting

TerryTheise.jpgI try to go annually to my local Terry Theise tastings, though I must say these usually crowded, elbow-to-elbow, hurried sip-and-spit affairs are a bit distressing. Still, I go. How can you not? Theise’s German and Austrian selections are impressive. How he assembled a thick portfolio of the regions’ great producers speaks about his insights.

Theise—if you’ve ever met the man, heard him talk, or read his off-beat wine catalogs that look more like ‘70s mimeographed anti-establishment handouts sprinkled with slogans and inspirational philosophical quotes (it’s probably what he wrote in his formative years)—is a charismatic dude. In fact this kind of off-beat, left-wing attitude has proven to be very effective in selling wines to the wine masses. Note the successes of Randall Grahm, Kermit Lynch, and Neal Rosenthal. Even savvy wine marketers as Jon Rimmerman of the popular Garagiste, as well as yours truly I confess also tries it, and a host of wine bloggers have styled themselves after this kind of radical chic wine talk. What exactly they (or we) are railing against I’m not sure. But, hey, this ‘tude sells wines!

I know I wouldn’t have time, and it’s ludicrous anyway, to systematically taste every wine being poured so I decided, as I often do in big tastings like this, to narrow it down to a few producers that I’m fond of and intend to buy, as well as other notable ones, to get an overall perspective of the vintage performance.

My quick overall impression is 2007 is an outstanding vintage for Austria and Germany. There many very good wines to like.

Continue reading "Terry Theise Vintage 2007 Germany and Austria Tasting" »

August 06, 2007

Tasting Panel: July 31-Aug. 1 Cool Climate Grapes in Hot Zones

TastingPanelHotClimate.JPG

Cool climate grapes such as Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon, Syrah, and Merlot are now planted in some of the warmest winegrowing regions in the world. So how good do they turn out? Here are three new releases from of cool climate grape varietals from producers in warm climate areas.

1. Mendocino Chardonnay "Francine's Selection", Toad Hollow 2006 ($15.00 suggested)

Vinified in stainless steel, no wood. Full malolactic fermentation and aged on its lees for 8 months. 13.9% Alcohol.

2. Lodi Cabernet Sauvignon, 337 Wine Cellars 2005 ($16.00 suggested)
Made from the 337 clone, a type of Cabernet Sauvignon that ripens early and does not develop herbal flavors. This grower has been a pioneer of this clone and has supplied fruit to many wineries. The grapes were cold-soaked for 24-36 hours before fermentation. The wine was aged in a mix of French and American oak. 14.5% Alcohol.

3. Barossa Shiraz/Cabernet Sauvignon/Merlot "Clancy's", Peter Lehmann 2004 ($21.00 suggested)
A blend of 43% Shiraz, 42% Cabernet Sauvignon, and 15% Merlot. 14.5% Alcohol.

Judgment/Comments:
Mendocino Chardonnay "Francine's Selection", Toad Hollow 2006
Thumbs Up: 80%
Thumbs Down: 20%
Pros: Fresh and smooth, citrusy, good acid
Cons: Too fruity

Lodi Cabernet Sauvignon, 337 Wine Cellars 2005
Thumbs Up: 60%
Thumbs Down: 40%
Pros: Good midweek wine, starts impressive but flattens out, smooth
Cons: Too fruity and extracted, too vegetal

Barossa Shiraz/Cabernet Sauvignon/Merlot "Clancy's", Peter Lehmann 2004
Thumbs Up: 80%
Thumbs Down: 20%
Pros: Classy, complex, smooth
Cons: none

Conclusions:
1. Cool climate grape varietals planted in warm climate areas result in fruity wines that have wide appeal among today's drinkers.

2. In addition, even more drinkers prefer those fruity wines that show interesting layers of flavors.

3. Peter Lehmann's Clancy was the overall winner in this series. The wine's blend of different grape varietals resulted in an interesting and complex flavor profile that appealed to most drinkers.

July 30, 2007

Tasting Panel: July 24-25 New California Reds

CalReds.jpg

Unlike other wine growing regions, California does not focus on any particularly grape varietal, but instead produces every major grape varietal on the planet. Here are threewines, each one from a different grape varietal and grown in different winegrowing regions in California.

1. Russian River Pinot Noir "Amber Ridge Vineyard", Connor Brennan Cellars 2005 ($26.00 suggested)

Small-lot production from a single vineyard that is highly regarded source of Pinot Noir in Russian River and is planted with the 777 clone. 14.5% Alcohol.

2. Dry Creek Valley Syrah, VJB Vineyards 2003 ($34.00 suggested)
Barrel-aged for 18 months in neutral American oak. 14.5% Alcohol.

3. El Dorado Zinfandel, VJB Vineyards 2003 ($34.00 suggested)
Aged for 18 months in 100% American oak. 15.5% Alcohol.

Judgment/Comments:
Russian River Pinot Noir "Amber Ridge Vineyard", Connor Brennan Cellars 2005
Thumbs Up: 67%
Thumbs Down: 33%
Pros: Nice fruit, smooth finish, yummy, big, brawny, good value, big for a Russian River Pinot, a bit sweet
Cons: Very light, acidic, somewhat one-dimensional

Dry Creek Valley Syrah, VJB Vineyards 2003 ($34.00 suggested)
Thumbs Up: 40%
Thumbs Down: 60%
Pros: Good body, forward, decadent, smooth tannins, good balance
Cons: Not much going on, harsh, overpriced

El Dorado Zinfandel, VJB Vineyards 2003 ($34.00 suggested)
Thumbs Up: 40%
Thumbs Down: 60%
Pros: Big, nice flavors, highly extracted
Cons: Hot, vegetal, no nose, overpriced

Conclusion:
1. Both the Syrah and Zinfandel from VJB Vineyards were deemed pricey by most drinkers for the quality they offer.

2. Despite the thumbs down votes, many still found the big, extracted, high alcohol, style of the Syrah and Zinfandel attractive. Had the price been significantly less, say close to half, it is likely that many would find these a good purchase.

3. The Pinot Noir from Russian River was well-liked by most drinkers mainly for its forward fruit and fuller style.

4. However, a good number of drinkers dissented on the taste of the Pinot Noir, finding its taste too light, which is surprising considering its big, full-bodied style. One suspects that, popular as Pinot Noir is today, many palates still prefer the big bruisers, like Syrahs and Zinfandels.

July 23, 2007

Tasting Panel: July 17-18 Avalon Winery's Wines for the People

Avalon.JPG

Here are three different wines from Sonoma-based wine producer, Purple Wine Company. This producer owns Avalon Winery label where it focuses on producing value Cabernet Sauvignon. A new label in its portfolio is Blue Jean.

1. California Red Wine, Blue Jean Winery NV ($11.00 suggested)
A new label from the Purple Wine Company of Sonoma. Most likely Cabernet Sauvignon-based. 13.5% Alcohol.

2. California Cabernet Sauvignon, Avalon Winery 2004 ($11.00 suggested)
The blend consists of 78% Cabernet Sauvignon, 17% Syrah, 4% Merlot, and 1% Tempranillo mainly from vineyards in the Central Coast (Monterey, Santa Barbara) and from Mendocino and Napa. 13.7% Alcohol. 3.66 pH. 5.5 grams total acidity.

3. Napa Cabernet Sauvignon, Avalon Winery 2005 ($18.00 suggested)
A blend of 86% Cabernet Sauvignon, 7% Syrah, 6% Merlot, and 1% Petite Sirah. Aged in a combination of French and American oak. 13.9% Alcohol. 3.89 pH. 7.5 grams total acidity.


Judgment/Comments:

California Red Wine, Blue Jean Winery NV
Thumbs Up: 89%
Thumbs Down: 11%
Pros: Fruity, good everyday wine, good label, balanced, rich, fun, easy
Cons: Bitter

California Cabernet Sauvignon, Avalon Winery 2004
Thumbs Up: 67%
Thumbs Down: 33%
Pros: Structured, more sophisticated than Blue Jean, smooth, smoky
Cons: Off-taste

Napa Cabernet Sauvignon, Avalon Winery 2005
Thumbs Up: 56%
Thumbs Down: 44%
Pros: More interesting, bold flavors, good fruit and tannins
Cons: Pricey, tart, good but not worth the extra bucks

Conclusions:

1. From the good turnout and positive overall response to these wines, it is clear that drinkers of fine wines now find low-priced California wines attractive. One can't this was the case just five years ago.

2. The lowest-priced, non-vintage red "Blue Jean" was the overwhelming favorite. Drinkers found it fruity but balanced and a good value everyday wine. Further, the blue jean label contributed to a hip, fun image which drinkers found attractive.

3. The two Cabernet Sauvignons, while well-liked did not particularly excite drinkers. They were seemingly perceived as somewhat stodgy, typical California Cabs.

July 16, 2007

Tasting Panel: July 10-11 Martin Ranch Story

Martin Ranch.jpg

A new challenge for the discerning tastes of our tasting panel. Here are four different wines from a well-established Santa Cruz Mountains wine producer called Martin Ranch. This producer makes both estate wines under the "Therese Vineyards" label and negociant wines under the "J.D. Hurley" label. The winemaking approach is interesting as it involves a long elevage and aging in a combination of French, American, and Hungarian oak before bottling and release.

1. Santa Clara Valley Merlot "J.D. Hurley", Martin Ranch 2004 ($22.00 suggested)
From Santa Clara Valley vineyards on the eastern side of Santa Cruz Mountains. 100% Merlot. Aged 21 months in 50% new and 50% neutral French, Hungarian, and American oak barrels. 600 cases produced 15.6% Alcohol.

2. Santa Clara Valley Cabernet Sauvignon "J.D. Hurley", Martin Ranch 2003 ($26.00 suggested)
97% Cabernet Sauvignon, 2% Merlot, and 1% Cabernet Franc. From a combination of 60% Santa Clara Valley vineyards and 40% estate-grown Santa Cruz Mountain grapes. The first release of this wine. Aged 32 months in a combination of new, 2-year-old, and neutral French, Hungarian, and American oak barrels. 800 cases produced 13.9% Alcohol.

3. Santa Cruz Mountains Cabernet Sauvignon "Thérèse Vineyard Reserve", Martin Ranch 2003 ($40.00 suggested)

Made from estate-grown grapes in the southern tip of the Santa Cruz Mountains. 94% Cabernet Sauvignon, 3% Merlot, and 3% Cabernet Franc aged for 28 months in a combination of new, one-year-old, and neutral French oak barrel. 200 cases produced 14% Alcohol.

4. Santa Clara Valley Syrah "Thérèse Vineyard", Martin Ranch 2004 ($30.00 suggested)

100% Syrah from two vineyard sources. Aged 21 months in 50% new and 50% neutral French and Hungarian oak. 400 cases produced 14.7% Alcohol.

Judgment/Comments:

Santa Clara Valley Merlot "J.D. Hurley", Martin Ranch 2004
Thumbs Up: 60%
Thumbs Down: 30%
Pros: "Fruity yet firm... plenty of extract... good power... nice for the price... good oak... alcohol is not obvious... good nose"
Cons: "Hot, alcoholic... disappointing taste... didn't taste like Merlot"

Santa Clara Valley Cabernet Sauvignon "J.D. Hurley", Martin Ranch 2003
Thumbs Up: 60%
Thumbs Down: 40%
Pros: "Good nose... good balance... not too strong, decent"
Cons: "Light... not enough fruit... not bold... bitter finish"

Santa Cruz Mountains Cabernet Sauvignon "Thérèse Vineyard Reserve", Martin Ranch 2003
Thumbs Up: 80%
Thumbs Down: 10%
Pros: "Fruity... good tannins... reserved but good fruit and tannins... soft and nice fruit... good finish... complex, aging potential... good structure"
Cons: "Too reserved.. pricey"

Santa Clara Valley Syrah "Thérèse Vineyard", Martin Ranch 2004
Thumbs Up: 100%
Thumbs Down: 0%
Pros: "Fruity spicy, good personality... great Syrah flavors... good aromatics and flavors... good length... drinkable... aging potential... well balanced"
Cons: none

Conclusions:
1. Very enthusiastic turnout for this tasting, mostly likely because of the attraction of a new Santa Cruz-based wine producer.

2. The aggressive, robust style of the J.D. Hurley Merlot surprised drinkers, especially those who don't usually drink Merlot, and the style appealed to most of them.

3. The smoother, softer, somewhat light style of the J.D. Hurley Cabernet Sauvignon was unexpected, especially coming after the Merlot. This style also pleased many drinkers.

4. The Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon though popular was seen as being a bit pricey.

5. The overall favorite was the Syrah. This wine's flavors and price point appealed to most drinkers.

July 12, 2007

The Rarest Rosé

RoseRicey.JPG

The commune of Riceys in the southern portion of the Champagne region has been producing for centuries tiny quantitites of the world's most rare rosé. Said to be the favorite of Louis XIV, this rosé is so rare that even in Champagne, let alone in France, few have heard of it. To my knowledge none is exported.

I was visiting Champagne last March and I took my buddy Robert with me. He decided to stay around a little longer after I've finished my appointments to do some R & R and hunt down this rare Rosé de Riceys. He got lucky as he found one wine store that stocked a few bottles of it. The proprietor was quite impressed at Robert for even asking for it.

Robert lugged the bottle back home and when we decided to have a bite together one day before watching a Giants ballgame he brought the bottle of Rosé de Riceys with him. This was probably the only bottle of this rosé in the country.

We sat at the bar of Coco 500, Loretta Keller's newly renovated hotstpot in the south of Market. We dug in a couple of the small plates that were both superb. One was the COCOmole “taco” ($4.00), a refined take on mole made with braised beef cheeks on crisp taco shells. Every piece was delicious. The other plate was a version of the Provence standard, a brandade served with fennel crackers ($6.00). Another homerun!

Mole1.JPG

brandade.JPG

Both small plates were superb with the particular taste of the Rosé de Riceys. Made of 100% Pinot Noir, this rosé is made by macerating the Pinot until the taste of Riceys is achieved, a procedure that requires not only a skilled winemaker but also one who knows the precise taste of Riceys.

The rosé has a deep cherry nose, very earthy and Pinot-like, it reminded me of the Pinot Noirs I've had from Alsace. The initial taste was of black cherries then layers fanned out revealing fresh herbs and lavender. Very delicate yet intense on the palate. Substantial for a rosé, hence the wine was a perfect accompaniment to our small plates.

Coco500
500 Brannan Street
San Francisco, CA
415.543.2222

July 10, 2007

Tasting Panel: June 26-27 Spanishin Regional Wines

Spanish Tasting.jpg

This time the following three regional Spanish wines were featured:

Rias Baixas Albariño, Olegario 2005 ($26.00 suggested)

From Spain's Galicia region in the northwest Atlantic coast. 100% Albariño grape. 12.5% Alcohol.

Navarra Rosado "Grand Feudo Rose Wine", Bodegas Julian Chivite 2005 ($19.00 suggested)

100% Grenache from estate-grown grapes in Navarra in north-central Spain above Rioja. 12.5% Alcohol. The grapes were macerated for 24 hours to allow the skin color to bleed prior to fermentation.

Castilla y Leon "Sardon de Duero Rivola", Abadia Retuerta 2003 ($20.00 suggested)

Made from estate-grown grapes in Sardon de Duero just outside Ribera del Duero in central Spain. 60% Tempranillo and 40% Cabernet Sauvignon aged fro 12 months in a combination of French and American oak. 13.5% Alcohol

Judgment/Comments:
Rias Baixas Albariño, Olegario 2005
Thumbs Up 88%
Thumbs Down 13%
Pros: Nice fruit, acidity but pricy, refreshing, good summer wine, good
balance, mineral finish
Cons: None

Navarra Rosado "Grand Feudo Rose Wine", Bodegas Julian Chivite 2005
Thumbs Up: 50%
Thumbs Down: 50%
Pros: Nice fruit, dry, interesting
Cons: Harsh, uninteresting, bland, tart, flat, simple

Castilla y Leon "Sardon de Duero Rivola", Abadia Retuerta 2003
Thumbs Up: 100%
Thumbs Down: 0%
Pros: Great balance, nice balance, complex. Bordeaux-like nose, easy drinking,
nice tannins, worth the price, smoky, robust, spicy, will age.
Cons: None

Conclusions:
1. The Albariño was deemed wonderful but pricey at a suggested price of $26, an average price for a California Chardonnay. Drinkers appear to have an expectation that Spanish whites should be low priced regardless of potential quality. In contrast, the same can not be said of white wines from California or France.

2. The Rosado was the least favorite, apparently suffering from being too light, too dry, and somewhat pricey.

3. The Rivola was liked by everyone.

June 29, 2007

BNO: Grooving on Pinot Noir, Roast Chicken, and Jazz

The long wake of the box office hit Sideways not only laid waste to Merlot, it also saw the launch of a gazillion new Pinot Noirs in California aching to exploit the wine drinking public’s sudden thirst for the wine once referred to as “the heartbreak grape”. Oddly, Burgundy, the home of Pinot Noir and the original inspiration for Pinot Noir pioneers in California and Oregon remains largely untouched by the trend. And many Sideways babies are only familiar with the Carlo Rossi “Burgundy”—yes, the 4-liter kind! So when our BNO (boys’ night out) group decided to do a “Pinot Noirs of the world” theme recently we made sure that Burgundy was well represented.

As gratifying as it may be to hunt down the best wines in the world, the drinking part is the most rewarding, especially when orchestrated to appeal to all senses. Matt, our maestro for the evening, was in rare form. So what if Joann may have assisted in the food department—a minor quibble, I submit—the menu was quite ambitious and, I must add, executed to perfection. Zuni roast chicken with bread salad is sort of like the Everest of roast chicken recipes—rebuilding a Weber carburetor is probably less daunting.

ZuniChicken.JPG
Zuni-style roast chicken chez Matt...

BreadSalad.JPG
and of course the all-important Bread Salad

Prior to dinner service, we tasted a mix of wines accompanied by hors d’oeuvres, including Matt’s delicious homemade tapenade. The 2002 Central Otago Pinot Noir “Block 3”, Felton Road, a favorite of major wine critics like Wine Spectator and Tanzer, was loaded with extract. Aromatic and brimming with big ripe cherry and raspberry flavors that was attractive initially but soon lacked excitement and got a bit flabby. “One-dimensional” said Steve. Group score was somewhere in the 2 to 2 ½ puffs range, if I remember correctly.

FeltonBlk302.JPG

The 2005 Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir, Patz & Hall was somewhat better. Lots of sweet cherries and some new oak on the nose, the flavors are big and ripe and dominated by spicy black cherries with lush, velvety tannins. “Rich and more going on here” (compared to the Felton Road), said Eric. “Great mouthfeel”, noticed Steve. Definitely, the richness of this Pinot Noir makes it very attractive, but the trade-off is the noticeable hotness on the finish that I expect to get harsher as the wine ages. This is best enjoyed young for its sinful opulence, and you really don’t have to bother drinking it with food. 3 puffs.

PatzHallPN05.JPG

Another attractive Pinot Noir was the 2000 Willamette Valley Pinot Noir, Shea. Shea Vineyard is the most well-known vineyard in Oregon. Owner, Dick Shea, planted the 200-acre property in 1990 mainly with Pinot Noir and some Chardonnay well before Oregon Pinot Noir started to boom in the late 1990s. I toured the property several years ago with Dick Shea and we drove around the hilly estate in his SUV. I was stunned by the size of the property—to my estimation it was easily the largest planting of Pinot Noir in Oregon. Either he was a visionary or plain lucky—or both—but the timing was great for Dick because less than a decade later demand for Oregon Pinot Noir skyrocketed. A horde of eager winemakers, many from California, with no vineyard to their name flocked to Willamette Valley to capitalize on the trend. So guess where they had to go begging for fruit? Shea’s 2000 Pinot Noir (I believe the winegrower’s debut vintage?) clearly shows Shea’s style—big, ripe, full of extract, and well-structured. Compared to a typical California Pinot Noir with similar ripeness and concentration, this shows better balance, especially with a modest 12.5% Alcohol! The wine delivers a lot of fruit and energy but lacks complexity. Lenny sees the wine as “not getting better.” 3 puffs.

SheaPN00.JPG

The two remaining pre-dinner wines were both Burgundies. Switching to the 2005 Bourgogne Rouge, Domaine Heresztyn is akin to suddenly throttling down. From the big ripe cherry and cassis flavors of domestic Pinot Noirs to the earthy, light cherry and spice flavors of this elegant Burgundy. 2005, of course, is widely regarded as one of the greatest vintages in Burgundy, not for the ripeness but for the purity of the wines. The group never got to rating this, but, heck, if something like the Felton Road got 2 to 2 ½ puffs I would give this the same accolade though from a completely different perspective.

Well, the next Burgundy for me was the biggest surprise of the evening, and I would add appropriately so because when we were mulling over the theme for this get-together Steve suggested throwing some 1969 Burgundies into the mix—no doubt he was eager to uncork this 1969 Chambolle-Musigny, Louis Jadot.

JadotChambolle69.JPG

Okay, I’m crazy about Louis Jadot wines and I believe that this estate is one of the greatest in Burgundy. I’ve tasted at the estate four times and have met its legendary wine director, Jacques Lardières, and its brilliant president, Pierre-Henry Gagey. Just last March, I was at Jadot again to taste the highly anticipated 2005s. Pierre-Henry generously hosted a luncheon for me and my guests at Jadot’s château in Beaune where we were treated to much older bottles of their wines from the estate’s cellars. Jadot’s vast network of ancient underground cellars store over a million bottles of wines from numerous vintages of the last two centuries. My jaw is somewhere on the dank floor of the cellar every time I see that incredible collection. Jadot’s wines can age almost forever.

JadotCellar.JPG
Louis Jadot's ancient cellars underneath Beaune

JadotMeursault1885.JPG

JadotMeursaultbottle.JPG

Speaking about old cellars, this 1969 Chambolle-Musigny has an interesting provenance as it came from a forgotten family wine collection that was stored in a wine cabinet whose cooling unit stopped working sometime in the last twenty or thirty years—when exactly it stopped working no one knows! I poured myself a glass—it was deeply colored with just a slight bricking on the rim. The bouquet was earthy and had a bit of sous bois. To Matt it smelled like “Manchester coal fire” and someone else said “burnt peat”. Amazingly, the wine tasted youthful, with fresh flavors of bright, ripe cherries and good underlying minerality. Considering its age, it had marvelous concentration and was certainly assertive with its well-integrated tannins and good acidity. On this fateful evening, this particular bottle rescued after nearly 40 years in a forgotten cellar had achieved that most precious quality in a fine wine: character. We somehow forgot to give this wine a rating, but I picked this one of my three favorite wines of the evening.

The next two Burgundies to follow were also from the successful 1969 vintage. Maison Louis Latour rules Corton as it owns more acreage on the famous hill than any other producer. The 1969 Corton Clos de la Vigne au Saint, Louis Latour comes from the estate’s monopole parcel. A lovely drinking ’69 that’s still powerful, fleshy, and expansive on the mouth—"tunnels through your palate” said Matt. At 38-years-old, some of the freshness is gone but it still drinks impressively. 3 ½ puffs.

LatourCorton69.JPG

The third 1969 Burgundy of the evening was the 1969 Echezeaux, Maison Leroy. This is everything you could hope for from a wine produced by Madame Leroy. Well-evolved, deeply perfumed, intense on the palate, multi-layered, and very long, this is prime Echezeaux. So often one wonders why Echezeaux was ever a grand cru, but this Leroy clearly makes the case for the pedigree. 4 puffs.

LeroyEchezeaux69.JPG

What a spectacular hat trick of 1969 red Burgundies! I really didn’t want to leave that vintage, yet there were a few more Burgundies left.

The 1983 Nuits-Saint-Georges, Maison Leroy was sweet and full of elegance. What it offers is not power, after all this is not Chambertin, but charm and finesse. This is drinking very well—juicy and intense on the palate with bright cherry, herbal, and mineral flavors. There is a firmness and hard edge that give the wine good grip especially in the finish. 3 ½ puffs.

Not surprisingly, we all love the 1985 Chambertin, Domaine Louis Trapet Pere et Fils (there is also a Vieilles Vignes version). 1985 is another successful vintage in the 1980s, a riper and less variable vintage than 1983. Who can’t be drawn to the generous, lush, seductive fruit of this wine? This was clearly the group’s wine of the night. Matt described the nose as a “wet horse”. While it didn’t seem to me that I was standing next to Secretariat, I think I knew what he meant, as the wine had that evolved sous bois aroma, like a forest floor, much loved by Burgundy fans. This is classic Chambertin, vigorous and galloping from the get-go. “Not shy at all” said Lenny. The flavors have very good concentration of ripe red-cassis fruits with a touch of the exotic, as well as meaty, beefy, round, and generous, with very good depth and a solid finish. Though I wish it had a bit more finesse to go with its power, there is a lot of wine here. 4 puffs.

TrapetChambertin85.JPG

We opened a bunch of other wines that didn’t quite measure up to the ones we just finished. The 1995 Corton Le Rognet, Bertrand Ambroise was still tight and unyielding. But the 1990 Santa Barbara Pinot Noir “Sanford & Benedict Vineyard, Sanford, the forerunner of today’s Santa Rita Hills AVA Pinot Noirs, was at best still fruity but clearly fading. Unfortunately, the 1990 Potter Valley Pinot Noir, Scuzao was flawed by TCA taint. And then we had two heavyweights from Russian River, the 1997 Russian River Pinot Noir “Little Hill”, Rochioli and the 1995 Russian River Pinot Noir “Rochioli Vineyard”, Williams Selyem. The Williams Selyem didn’t show too well as it was dominated by a smell described by some as “shoe polish”, “rubbery”, and “herbal”. On the other hand, the Rochioli while fruity was somewhat flat and lacked freshness.

This BNO theme highlighted something long-time Pinot Noir fans already know. Pinot Noir just doesn’t like to be pigeon-holed, but on the other hand many drinkers don’t want to be surprised, either, and prefer something more formulaic and predictable. This is the great disconnect with Pinot Noir. To get around this problem, producers in the U.S. and New Zealand make Pinot Noir that emphasize the grape’s fruitiness so you know pretty much what you’re getting every time you open a bottle. Drinkers, especially those turned on to Pinot Noir by Sideways, are very happy with Pinot Noir today—they buy a bottle, they drink it, and it’s pretty much what they expect… until they try to age it for eight years or more then all bets are off.

Many red Burgundies are also being made like their California, Oregon, and New Zealand counterparts. But the finer red Burgundies, in contrast, need to be aged to tame their harder edges, and even then the flavors are not what many might expect or really enjoy—you can get Secretariat coming out of the bottle, a whole forest floor, coal fires, etc., etc., and, of course, fruit is not the raison d’etre of Burgundy but elegance, balance, and finesse.

What I like about our BNO group is that we can enjoy all these contrasting styles and viewpoints in wine. We’re definitely all hard critics and for us, it’s all about discovering something new and truly enjoyable. There’s never a dull moment in these get-togethers.

Finally, we settled down in the outdoor patio in front of a fire, Port in one hand and a cigar on the other. A good breeze was swirling the woodsmoke everywhere, seemingly following Kevin wherever he decided to sit. But it’s alright. Matt adjusted the volume on his outdoor speakers so we can listen better to Herb Alpert blowing his soothing trumpet.

June 25, 2007

Tasting Panel: Sequoia Grove plus The Other Guys

Last week's tasting panel wines featured two wines from the populist but limited production wines of Don Sebastiani & Sons and a wine from Sequoia Grove, a Napa stalwart that has seen tremendous improvement in the last few years since its takeover by deep-pocketed Kobrand Corporation.

SebastianiSequoia.jpg

Here are the wines featured:

Napa Chardonnay "le bon vin de la Napa Valley", The Other Guys (Don Sebastiani & Sons) 2005 ($15.00 suggested)
100% Chardonnay from purchased grapes. 13.5% Alcohol, 3.41 pH, and .63 mg/L TA. 500 cases produced.

Napa Chardonnay, Sequoia Grove 2005 ($20.00 suggested)
Winemaker is Michael Trujillo, head winemaker at Sequoia Grove and of Karl Lawrence fame. 100% Chardonnay from Carneros. Fermented in stainless steel with white Burgundy yeasts strains. Aged 10 months in new French oak with bi-monthly lees steering. Malolactic fermentation was fully blocked to maintain acidity. 13.8% Alcohol.

Dry Creek Zinfandel "Plungerhead Old Vines", The Other Guys (Don Sebastiani & Sons) 2005 ($18.00 suggested)
100% Zinfandel from purchased grapes. 14.9% Alcohol, 3.63 pH, and .68mg/L TA. 4,250 cases produced.


Judgment/Comments:
Napa Chardonnay "le bon vin de la Napa Valley", The Other Guys (Don Sebastiani & Sons) 2005
Thumbs Up: 73%
Thumbs Down: 27%
Pros: fresh, balance, lighter "Chablis" style, mineral, smooth, easy drinking, good value, better nose than palate
Cons: crowd pleaser, label needs help-like a club soda bottle, bit simple, bland

Napa Chardonnay, Sequoia Grove 2005
Thumbs Up: 73%
Thumbs Down: 27%
Pros: oaky, crisp, long finish, "California Chardonnay" taste, positive "ditsy blonde" association, tastes like it can still age, somewhat Burgundian, good acidity, nice mouthfeel, great price, good finish
Cons: big, not much going on, detracts from crisp Burgundy style

Dry Creek Zinfandel "Plungerhead Old Vines", The Other Guys (Don Sebastiani & Sons) 2005
Thumbs Up: 91%
Thumbs Down: 9%
Pros: spicy, full body but not too strong, intense aroma but not over the top taste, good balance, sweeter fruit, alcohol is well hidden, refreshing, good food wine
Cons: jammy, hot finish, crowd pleaser, lighter than other Plungerhead Zinfandels

Conclusions:
1. The three wines proved to be highly favorable among the tasters and are all clear winners.

2. The three wines showed wide appeal even among different kinds of tastes.

3. A key reason for the positive response to the wines is their price points.

June 19, 2007

Tasting Panel: June 12-13 2007 Maboroshi Wines

Maboroshi Wine Estates of Russian River is a most interesting producer. Maboroshi is owned and operated by Tom and Rebecca Kisaichi. In 1991 this couple decided to pursue a dream of producing wines and left their home in Japan to train in Burgundy with Charles Rousseau of Domaine Armand Rousseau in Gevrey-Chambertin, one of Burgundy's greatest estates. Afterwards, they moved to Napa and Sonoma to continue their training and after several years decided to establish their own wine estate. Their first release was from the 2000 vintage. These are their current releases.

Maboroshi.JPG

Russian River Pinot Noir "Maboroshi Vineyard", Maboroshi Wine Estates 2005 ($38.00 suggested)
100% Pinot Noir grown in the hills of western Sebastopol with micro yields of only 1 ton/acre. Harvested on Oct. 3, 2005 at 25.7 Brix. Pre-fermentation cold-soak. Aged for 10 months in 100% French oak (50% new). 14.3% Alcohol, 3.87 pH, and 3.87 g/L TA. 297 cases produced.

Napa Merlot, Maboroshi Wine Estates 2003 ($33.00 suggested)
91% Merlot and 9% Cabernet Sauvignon grown on Spring Mountain in Napa. Harvested Oct. 13, 2003 at 25.7 Brix. Pre-fermentation cold-soak of whole berries. Partial native yeast fermentation. Aged for 16 months in 100% French oak (75% new). 14.2% Alcohol, 3.81 pH, and 5.78 g/L TA. 323 cases produced.

Spring Mountain (Napa) Cabernet Sauvignon, Maboroshi Wine Estates 2002 ($48.00 suggested)
93% Cabernet Sauvignon and 7% Merlot grown on Spring Mountain in Napa. Harvested Oct. 11, 2002 at 25.7 Brix. Four-day pre-fermentation cold-soak of whole berries. All native yeast fermentation. Aged for 22 months in 100% new French oak. 14.2% Alcohol, 3.81 pH, and 5.81 g/L TA. 300 cases produced.

Judgment/Comments:
Pinot Noir
Thumbs Up: 44%
Thumbs Down: 56%
Pros: aromatic, nice acid balance, nice terroir, complex, fresh, good potential, fruit forward, concentrated
Cons: atypical, tight, underfruited, finish hot, petroleum taste, interesting taste but don't care too much for, try with food, bitter

Merlot
Thumbs Up: 50%
Thumbs Down: 50%
Pros: round mouthfeel, soft, elegant, plumy, herbal, complex, smooth tannins
Cons: herbal, green olive, slight medicinal nose, nothing special, nose/flavor are unexpected for Merlot, better than the Pinot but still not good enough, bitter, too much tannin

Cabernet Sauvignon
Thumbs Up: 50%
Thumbs Down: 38%
Neutral: 12%
Pros: great cab nose, mountain fruit, minty/eucalyptus, firm tannins, good balance, strong, Port-like, best of the three but pricey
Cons: disjointed, restrained, underwhelming for price, best of the three but not fruity enough, can’t recommend over other Napa cabs for the price

Conclusions:
1. None of the wines exhibited any fault and no one among the tasters noted any as well. So I would venture that the judgment and comments were more a reaction to the style of the wines than to their quality.

2. There wasn't any clear winner as the judgment was split almost evenly between thumbs up and thumbs down in all the three wines.

3. Tasters' comments were mostly mirror opposites particularly with regards to ripeness and flavors. Though the wines were technically fully ripe some described them as being "underfruited" and "not fruity enough", while others liked their "elegance" and "balance".

The wines' strong display of varietal and maybe even vineyard character were liked by some but abhorred by others. Note that the wines' producers used native yeast to ferment the wines as naturally as possible. The obvious herbal, minty varietal character in both the Merlot and Cabernet Sauvignon turned off some of the tasters, but appealed to others as being a "great cab nose" and as being "typical". The same was true for the Pinot Noir, whose layer of flavors was enjoyed by some as being "complex" and expressive of a "terroir", but dismissed by others as "atypical", "petroleum" and at best "interesting but don't care too much".

In retrospect, I think it is worth mentioning again that the winemaker, Tomohiro "Tom" Kisaichi, is a native of Japan and apprenticed at Domaine Armand Rousseau of Gevrey-Chambertin in Burgundy. Though still finding it a challenge to speak English well, Tom continued his wine education at UC Davis and worked at wineries in Sonoma and Napa before starting their wine estate in Russian River in the late 1990s. Over half of their production goes to the Japanese market.


January 31, 2007

Tasting Bordeaux 2004

Bordeaux producers from the Union des Grands Crus hosted a tasting a few weeks ago of their 2004 wines in San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, and New York. Sandwiched between two highly hyped vintages, 2003 and 2005, and the fact that the usual wine critics haven't spent much ink, so far, writing up about this vintage, the Bordeaux producers have wisely seized the task themselves of spreading the joys of their 2004 wines.

TastingHall.JPG

There were several hundred wines being tasted, mostly from stellar producers. Though the First Growths were nowhere to be seen and a handful of top tier producers like Ausone, Cheval Blanc, Pavie, and Leoville-Lascases did not make it, many of the best and brightest of Bordeaux these days were pouring their wines.

Overall, it was not a bad vintage. There is much variability in the quality of the wines, but non-Medoc regions like Saint-Emilion, Pomerol, and Graves showed the most consistency. Pauillac and Margaux appear to yield the least amount of exciting wines, which pretty much explains why this vintage is not getting its fair share of hype. I mean, Bordeaux is a huge place, with microclimates in each of its regions. Almost the entirety of Bordeaux can experience a bad vintage, but as long as key estates in Pauillac and Margaux come up with excellent wines one would hear mainly hype about the vintage from the wine media. Such is the prevailing bias. Pauillac and Margaux, Pauillac especially, hold the keys to the market success of the entire region.

From Graves, I like the wines in both colors that the regeion is famous for. In whites, Domaine de Chevalier produced a thrilling white, the best in the tasting, with very good concentration, freshness, and depth. The whites from this venerable estate are usually second only to the whites of Haut-Brion and La Mission Haut-Brion. Smith Haut-Lafitte Blanc showed very good balance and minerality and I liked it a lot. Other wonderful white are the ones from Fieuzal, Larrivet-Haut-Brion, and the little-known Chantegrive. Carbonnieux, whose 2003 blanc is one of the best from that difficult vintage for whites, unfortunately did not excite me this time.

Graves reds showed even more brillaince. This time I was impressed with Carbonnieux. But one of the most impressive was Haut-Bailly--seemingly forward in style because of its excellent balance, it's very classy. Larrivet-Haut-Brion and Smith Haut-Lafitte were also impressive. Both displaying the forward style of this vintage.

In St.-Emilion there is even more to choose from. My favorites include Beau-Sejour Becot, Figeac (stunning!), Clos Fourtet, Pavie-Macquin, Troplong Mondot, Grand Mayne, and the little-known Dassault. But I wasn't too thrilled about Angelus, which I found a bit too extracted for the vintage and trying too hard to please. 2004 is a vintage that rewards wines that are more relaxed in style.

The handful of Pomerol estates in attendance did not disappoint, with both Clinet and Gazin showing very good stuff indeed. But La Conseillante was truly spectacular--very ripe, very sweet; the tannins so rich and velvety.

As I mentioned, Margaux did not perform well, however, at least one that stood out was Du Tertre--it was perfumy, ripe, and intense. Its favored exposure at the top of a hill in Margaux plus the brilliant winemaking really paid off. This is one of the best buys of the vintage.

In Sauternes there is much to like. Rayne Vigneau and Lafaurie-Peyraguey turned out exceptional wines that are rich and layered and supported by good acidity. My top picks, though, are La Tour Blanche and de Fargues.

LaTourBlanche.JPG

La Tour Blanche picked brutally as a result of the rain during harvest, leaving as much as 70% of the fruit unpicked. The sacrifice was definitely worth it as the wine showed beautiful sweetness and freshness on the palate, with wonderful length on the finish.

De Fargues, which is a separate estate owned by Yquem, also sorted brutally as the hailstorm destroyed about 60% of the crop. This is a wine with much delicacy and charm; instead of wowing you with richness, whcih it has a good amount of, it also seduces with its finesse and elegance. A marvelous feat.

December 24, 2006

Boys' Night Out Las Vegas Rendezvous

It was impossible to pass up the opportunity to trek to Las Vegas for a BNO (boys’ night-out) last month. Stephen Marshall, executive chef of the Medici at the Ritz-Carlton Lake Las Vegas, obliged to prepare a special dinner menu to match up with whatever wines we could muster. A consensus, more or less, evolved over the wine theme, and as soon as all the bottles were gathered up and styrofoamed for the airplane check-in, the Vegas affair was afoot

RitzMedicikitchen.JPG

A trio of Champagnes started the evening. Eric uncorked the surprise performer, an unpretentious and somewhat obscure non-vintage Champagne Brut Rosé de Saignée from Duval-Leroy. Duval-Leroy, a venerable estate in Vertus, is one of the few Champagne houses that produce pink Champagne using the traditional saignée method. It’s the long method of making pink wines—instead of simply mixing some red wine to white wine to produce a rosé, Duval-Leroy uses 100% Pinot Noir, macerating the skin with the first-pressed juice for about 24 to 48 hours to allow just enough time for the skin color to “bleed” and produce a wine with a lovely salmon pink hue. This Champagne put out its seductive charms with its baked fruit aromas and rich, mouthfilling flavors of dense fruitcake. Matt detected “almond and almond extract”. It was truly captivating Champagne! At least 3 puffs.

Duval Leroy Rose.JPG


The 1997 Champagne Brut Rosé “Cuvée Alexandra” Laurent-Perrier that followed was more reticent. A deep salmon pink color. On the nose, it smelled as yeasty as baking bread; and after a while in the glass it starts to taste more like Burgundy, deliciously nutty and minerally. It is built to last and with its firm, sturdy character, tastes like it can age another 10 years or more. This 1997 is just the fourth release of this special Champagne as it’s only made in special years. A blend of 80% Pinot Noir and 20% Chardonnay—all from grand cru vineyards—vinification starts with a short maceration period of the two grapes to extract the color. 3 ½ puffs was the consensus score after considerable deliberation and comparison with the Duval-Leroy.

LaurentPerrierAlexandre97.JPG


We drank the 1995 Comtes Blanc de Blancs Taittinger in style, while riding in the limo en route to the restaurant. Serious tasting was not easy as the Champagne sloshed in the glass most of the way. It was quite creamy and the flavors were again reminiscent of a big white Burgundy. Almost brutally dry, mouthfilling and very minerally. This bottle was just way too tight and young. It really needs several more years to mellow as it is quite a brute right now. 3 ½ puffs.

Taittinger Comtes '95.JPG


As soon as we settled down around the spacious round chef’s table, the next flight commenced. It was an interesting pair of Corton-Charlemagne from the distant past: 1978 Joseph Drouhin and 1982 Bonneau du Martray.The Bonneau du Martray estate is of course the embodiment of Corton-Charlemagne itself. It’s the giant of the appellation, owning a whopping 9-plus hectares of vineyard, and it’s almost sole production is Corton-Charlemagne (an inconsequential amount of red Corton is also produced). It’s situated on the Pernand side where the character is more mineral and elegant and the wines more long-lived. The 1982 is mature, but still very fresh; tasting of honeyed fruits with hints of citrus/orange. What a brilliant bottle from a so-so Burgundy vintage! It is clearly one of Bonneau du Martray’s best. That after nearly a quarter of a century, this wine can be so fresh-tasting and elegant is proof of the superiority of the Bonneau du Martray terroir. Veteran and novice wine collectors, alike, who focus mainly on “vintages of the century” are missing out and overspending; oftentimes, great wines are produced in unheralded years. Group score is 3 puffs.

How lucky can we get to have not one, but two great Corton-Charlemagne experiences in one night! The 1978 Corton-Charlemagne from Joseph Drouhin was another stellar performer, but it was more reticent. From the get-go it was outclassed by the Bonneau du Martray. But an hour or so later, the Drouhin blossomed and blew us away! Looking back, maybe we should have decanted it. Some experts do recommend decanting aged grand cru white Burgundies, particularly Corton-Charlemagne. At any rate, the two Corton-Charlemagnes couldn’t be more different. Drouhin, a negociant, nevertheless has owned a parcel in Corton-Charlemagne for quite some time, so this is a domaine wine. 1978 was another average, at best, white Burgundy vintage, yet this is one of the great Corton-Charlemagnes from Drouhin. Ha! Ha! Another reason to throw away vintage charts. Tight for a while, but later fragrant with floral, toasted bread scents. This has penetrating depth, very long, vivid, and totally focused. The flavors are just amazingly persistent. Consider the fact that this Chardonnay has evolved for nearly thirty years! Group score is 3 ½ puffs.

Drouhin Corton-Charl 78.JPG

Well, on with the reds from this point on. What follows is the main theme of the evening: 1982 Bordeaux. To sort of “cleanse” both our glasses and palates a bottle of 1984 Pichon-Lalande (“glass-coater”, says Steve) was passed around. No one expected much from this lowly bottle, but it more than did its job. A touch earthy and mushroomy, with the familiar Pichon-Lalande floral-sweet cedar-plum scents coming through. Graceful and still weighty on the palate. I’m reminded of what Michael Broadbent wrote about one of his favorite Bordeaux: “certainly fully mature, an easy style of wine, the tannin so noticeable at a tasting bench would be unnoticeable with food; it would merely serve to refresh, leave the mouth clean and dry—an aid to the digestion. That is what good claret is for.”

Pichon Lalande 82 84.JPG

The first 4 puffer of the evening was the 1982 Pichon-Lalande. This beauty exuded floral, violets, and earthy scents. Very lush, sweet, and somewhat chocolatey. It felt fresh on the palate, with its good acid balance, and the tannins were rich and velvety smooth. Never forceful, but totally persistent in its long finish. It held steady in the glass throughout the evening. What a gloriously harmonious wine! Will it continue to improve? I think that’s a subjective notion. I very much like the way it is right now, mature yet youthfully fresh and energetic. There is no question in my mind that this is at its peak.

Palmer 82.JPG

A pristine-looking bottle of 1982 Palmer followed next. Let me say first that it is a highly attractive wine for its powerful fruit and robust character. But it remains a puzzler as it is rough-edged and its expression is muddled. There is a lack of the Palmer elegance and, instead, more cru bourgeois. Will it still blossom in later years? Nevertheless, good wine is still good wine, as it adequately accompanied a marvelous plate of medium-rare New York strip venison in a sauce infused with juniper oil extract. 3 puffs.

Cos.JPG

The 1982 Cos d’Estournel had no hesitation; it opened up immediately as soon as it hit the glass. Mouthfilling, soft, and lush, with flavors of dark chocolate-coated blackberries. It’s almost like a fruit-bomb, soft-centered and lacking grip, yet its energy and liveliness are essentially what still make it so good. It, too, was great with the venison, proving that great producers like Palmer and Cos don’t have to come up with perfect wines to be enjoyable 24 years after the vintage. 3 puffs.

Leoville Lascases 82.JPG

More than any other vintage, 1982 pushed Léoville-Las-Cases to the front ranks of Bordeaux's quality hierarchy and made its name synonymous with the term, “super-second”. Perhaps its greatest success, the 1982 is still backward and evolving, yet the potential is clear. The nose has reached a point of lovely maturity, with its bouquet of tobacco and sweet herbs. On the palate it is already austere and elegant and still backed by excellent concentration of fruit that is very cassis. After an hour or so in the glass, its power is more evident in its firmness and muscular concentration. This is a serious wine, not a drink to trifle with; its character is dry and cerebral, not sensual. 4 puffs.

It’s interesting to observe that the 1982 Mouton-Rothschild is not so dissimilar to the 1982 Léoville-Las-Cases as both are still backward wines and probably another decade till peak. But the Mouton is definitely seductive, with its sweet and spicy cigar box nose; its velvety tannins; and its lush, concentrated flavors of cassis and ripe plums. The sweet flavors stay long on the mid-palate, and then turn austere and elegant on the lengthy finish, with notable freshness and good acid balance. In today’s tendency for low-acid, high alcohol wines, it’s notable that this powerful, long-lived Mouton has 11.5% alcohol! 4 puffs.

In the midst of all these Bordeaux, a 1997 Joseph Phelps Insignia was passed around. To be honest, I failed to take notes on this one and my memory may not do enough justice to it. Suffice it to say that is was still drinking young and it was quite a change from the Bordeaux not just for its more voluminous fruit, but for its sharp minty flavors. A standout Cabernet Sauvignon I’m sure.

This whole dinner affair was undoubtedly exhilarating but quite fatiguing as well. At least four hours had passed from the time we started, and there was one more drink to go and, of course, cigars. We repaired to the outside patio to polish off the decanted 1963 Fonseca Port. The red mahogany-colored liquid was very sweet and velvety. Its fragrant nose recalled preserved plums, chocolate, and cedar. In the mouth it was powerful, aggressive, almost rough, but it caressed with its heady sweet raspberry, earthy, licorice flavors. Very long, sustained finish. An astonishing Port for its power and youth!

Fonseca Port 63.JPG